outra9e
7th January 2002, 16:15
Do you know if there is a domain for a tick box field?
I want the customer to be able to define whether a record is void and beleive a tick box is the easiest way. Is there a domain or if not how do I go about creating a new one?
Thanks for your time.
evesely
7th January 2002, 16:25
If by tick box you are talking about the same thing as a check box, then there is a session specifically for doing this. In IVc4, use ttgfd4120m000 (4520 in Baan V). It looks like domain ttyeno in both cases is a yes/no check box.
crincoli
7th January 2002, 16:26
Application configuration/Miscell/Maintain domain to be displayed as check box
may be useful? Bye Pietro
outra9e
7th January 2002, 16:27
thnak u for this, so i just need to specify the domain as tt yeno simple as that!!!
thanks a lot.
outra9e
7th January 2002, 16:44
i have tried to use the domain tt yeno but it has given me an error saying no integration with package tt!!
Help!! any ideas...
Cheers
patvdv
7th January 2002, 17:01
This is a wild guess as I am not a developer but would this not have to be tc.yeno?
evesely
7th January 2002, 17:16
OK, I never really tried ttyeno. I also show tgyenox as yes/no with a check box. I would think that a tg domain should allow integration.
If that fails, you just might want to add your own tc domain (e.g., tcyn.chk), add it in the session I mentioned, and then run Convert Runtime Data Dictionary. Then once you exited and re-entered Baan, you should be able to use it at will. Of course you could pick an existing domain like tcyesno, but that might have unwanted consequences -- I would not suggest that.
outra9e
7th January 2002, 17:19
cheers guys i had a look and tried tg yenox and that works, got another question now!!!! hehe
any idea of the domain for an autonumber?
As records are added I want the record to have an automatic, sequential number allocated.
Any ideas as to the domain I need to be allocating this field?
Cheers guys
patvdv
7th January 2002, 17:54
I am closing the thread now to avoid different topics getting mixed up. There is already another thread open about 'Autonumber field' :)