rajitha
16th August 2017, 13:43
Hi All,

Under which conditions ,does the standard message ttstps0176 appears
"record modified by other user,new values are displayed"

Thanks & Regards,
Rajitha Cherupally

oirfeodent
17th August 2017, 08:47
Hi All,

Under which conditions ,does the standard message ttstps0176 appears
"record modified by other user,new values are displayed"

Thanks & Regards,
Rajitha Cherupally

In general, when any of the choice section gets executed and baan identifies the screen data is updated by the same/different/any user in a different session (Mismatch between DB & Screen data)... it shows this message and proceeds to update the display.

Can you eloborate, if you are looking for any specific case?

Regards,

rajitha
18th August 2017, 08:22
In general, when any of the choice section gets executed and baan identifies the screen data is updated by the same/different/any user in a different session (Mismatch between DB & Screen data)... it shows this message and proceeds to update the display.

Can you eloborate, if you are looking for any specific case?

Regards,


hi,

When I try to change a field (enum field) from one status to other ,it throws me this message.
How to fix this issue.

Thanks & Regards,
Rajitha Cherupally

andreas.toepper
18th August 2017, 09:28
Is the program performing updates when the value of the enum field is changed in the mask? (Thinking of when.field.changes section or DAL.)

rajitha
18th August 2017, 14:29
Is the program performing updates when the value of the enum field is changed in the mask? (Thinking of when.field.changes section or DAL.)

Hi Andreas,

attached the when field changes code here.
and also there is no dal for the table.
field we are changing is "tpptc050.stls"
Thanks & Regards,
Rajitha

mark_h
18th August 2017, 14:52
Did you put it in debug mode and see exactly which statement is makes the error appear?

andreas.toepper
21st August 2017, 08:44
There's nothing catching my eye. Did you change some part of this section right before the message occurred for the first time?


if tpptc050.stls > tpptc.stls.free and
tpptc050.codt = 0 then
tpptc050.codt = utc.num ()
else
if tpptc050.stls = tpptc.stls.free then
tpptc050.codt = 0
endif
endif

tpptc050.codt is modified but not displayed. I don't know, whether this will be raising the error if tpptc050.codt is displayed on the mask.