NPRao
9th October 2002, 01:11
Hi Guys,
What does this line mean ?
:SEQU:fmlbd300.sfty fmlbd300.sfco fmlbd300.stty fmlbd300.stco fmlbd300.ulad fmlbd300.stad fmlbd300.load
$ tail $BSE/dict/ddb52a/dfmlbd
:REFC:fmzld300.shpm 0 t1
:REFC:fmzmf400.shpm 1 t1
:REFC:fmzmf401.shpm 1 t1
A
:AUDT:fmlbd300.aamt fmlbd300.acpu fmlbd300.addt fmlbd300.bpsn fmlbd3
00.ccty fmlbd300.ccur fmlbd300.cdat fmlbd300.cdec fmlbd300.cpln f
mlbd300.cpro
:AUDT:fmlbd300.cvat fmlbd300.cvyn fmlbd300.eamt fmlbd300.idoc fmlbd3
00.invd fmlbd300.ityp fmlbd300.ldad fmlbd300.lddt fmlbd300.load f
mlbd300.pddt
:AUDT:fmlbd300.proc fmlbd300.rfsh fmlbd300.rono fmlbd300.serv fmlbd3
00.sfad fmlbd300.sfco fmlbd300.sfty fmlbd300.shpm fmlbd300.ssta f
mlbd300.stad
:AUDT:fmlbd300.stco fmlbd300.stty fmlbd300.text fmlbd300.ulad
S
:SEQU:fmlbd300.sfty fmlbd300.sfco fmlbd300.stty fmlbd300.stco fmlbd3
00.ulad fmlbd300.stad fmlbd300.load
It seems after our code migrations, runtime for tables etc, we are finding that the DD files between the 2 Package Combinations are not matching and there is a difference in the SEQU statements.
>find . -type f -exec td {} \;
212c212
< :SEQU:fmlbd300.sfty fmlbd300.sfco fmlbd300.stty fmlbd300.stco fmlb
d300.ulad fmlbd300.stad fmlbd300.load
---
> :SEQU:fmlbd300.sfty fmlbd300.sfco fmlbd300.stty fmlbd300.stco fmlb
d300.stad fmlbd300.ulad fmlbd300.load
212c212
< :SEQU:fmlbd300.sfty fmlbd300.sfco fmlbd300.stty fmlbd300.stco fmlb
d300.ulad fmlbd300.stad fmlbd300.load
---
> :SEQU:fmlbd300.sfty fmlbd300.sfco fmlbd300.stty fmlbd300.stco fmlb
d300.stad fmlbd300.ulad fmlbd300.load
diff: input file ../ddb52aibtd/./td: No such file or directory
When I view the tables definitions, and its fields, for both the VRC's they are same and runtime was done but there's still a difference in the data dictionary files...
Any clues? :confused:
What does this line mean ?
:SEQU:fmlbd300.sfty fmlbd300.sfco fmlbd300.stty fmlbd300.stco fmlbd300.ulad fmlbd300.stad fmlbd300.load
$ tail $BSE/dict/ddb52a/dfmlbd
:REFC:fmzld300.shpm 0 t1
:REFC:fmzmf400.shpm 1 t1
:REFC:fmzmf401.shpm 1 t1
A
:AUDT:fmlbd300.aamt fmlbd300.acpu fmlbd300.addt fmlbd300.bpsn fmlbd3
00.ccty fmlbd300.ccur fmlbd300.cdat fmlbd300.cdec fmlbd300.cpln f
mlbd300.cpro
:AUDT:fmlbd300.cvat fmlbd300.cvyn fmlbd300.eamt fmlbd300.idoc fmlbd3
00.invd fmlbd300.ityp fmlbd300.ldad fmlbd300.lddt fmlbd300.load f
mlbd300.pddt
:AUDT:fmlbd300.proc fmlbd300.rfsh fmlbd300.rono fmlbd300.serv fmlbd3
00.sfad fmlbd300.sfco fmlbd300.sfty fmlbd300.shpm fmlbd300.ssta f
mlbd300.stad
:AUDT:fmlbd300.stco fmlbd300.stty fmlbd300.text fmlbd300.ulad
S
:SEQU:fmlbd300.sfty fmlbd300.sfco fmlbd300.stty fmlbd300.stco fmlbd3
00.ulad fmlbd300.stad fmlbd300.load
It seems after our code migrations, runtime for tables etc, we are finding that the DD files between the 2 Package Combinations are not matching and there is a difference in the SEQU statements.
>find . -type f -exec td {} \;
212c212
< :SEQU:fmlbd300.sfty fmlbd300.sfco fmlbd300.stty fmlbd300.stco fmlb
d300.ulad fmlbd300.stad fmlbd300.load
---
> :SEQU:fmlbd300.sfty fmlbd300.sfco fmlbd300.stty fmlbd300.stco fmlb
d300.stad fmlbd300.ulad fmlbd300.load
212c212
< :SEQU:fmlbd300.sfty fmlbd300.sfco fmlbd300.stty fmlbd300.stco fmlb
d300.ulad fmlbd300.stad fmlbd300.load
---
> :SEQU:fmlbd300.sfty fmlbd300.sfco fmlbd300.stty fmlbd300.stco fmlb
d300.stad fmlbd300.ulad fmlbd300.load
diff: input file ../ddb52aibtd/./td: No such file or directory
When I view the tables definitions, and its fields, for both the VRC's they are same and runtime was done but there's still a difference in the data dictionary files...
Any clues? :confused: