lsatenstein
21st July 2004, 19:25
tdmcs0198m000 provides the opportunity to identify sessions that would benefit from table boosters.
As the session help does not explain what type of processing against tables would be improved, if you have experience with table boosters, I would like feedback for the following questions.
If large number of deletes are being performed against a table, is it a good candidate for being "Boosted"?
If a large number of references are being checked against a table, but the table is only read, would it be a candidate. The reference checking is not always against the same key.
Finally, I presume yes to the following.
Repeated read references to a table using the same key would benefit from the table being listed for boosting. True of false?
Did I miss any condition where the table would be placed into the booster category?
Your feedback would be most appreciated. (We have no source so we also do not know fully which tables are used by a session). (Ex. session tdpur4223m000)
As the session help does not explain what type of processing against tables would be improved, if you have experience with table boosters, I would like feedback for the following questions.
If large number of deletes are being performed against a table, is it a good candidate for being "Boosted"?
If a large number of references are being checked against a table, but the table is only read, would it be a candidate. The reference checking is not always against the same key.
Finally, I presume yes to the following.
Repeated read references to a table using the same key would benefit from the table being listed for boosting. True of false?
Did I miss any condition where the table would be placed into the booster category?
Your feedback would be most appreciated. (We have no source so we also do not know fully which tables are used by a session). (Ex. session tdpur4223m000)