Ronnyj
15th February 2007, 18:21
We're in a discussion on upgrading our baan5c (unix/oracle) system to BaaN LN. The question regarding using a win2003 with MSSQL server has came up and I thought I could check with you guys if you have any negative/positive experience with this setup?
There will be approx 150 simultanious users.
trchandra
16th February 2007, 00:09
Hi Ronny,
We have implemented Baan LN on MSSQL for one of our customer and we didn't have any problems except that you loose the flexibility of dividing indices and data into different table spaces in Oracle by company for better management of data files. Other than that everything seems to be working fine and you should not have any problems for 150~ concurrent users.
regards
mohdzain
16th February 2007, 04:31
Currently to be honest, our users are not that many. But installation setup wise is quite fast. Only a few tweaks would do on SQL.
Han Brinkman
16th February 2007, 12:40
Guess it will work. However if you have done some shell scripting around your current unix/baan installation be prepared that this will not be so easy any more on the windows platform.
There are some threads regarding the advantages of windows, have a look so that you as admin are prepared.
Regards,
Han
vinceco252
16th February 2007, 22:14
I've also had several customers on Windows 2003 and SQL 2000 SP3a (No SQL 2005 yet...). No problems I am aware of, other than, as Han mentions, the lack of OS scripting. You can actually emulate tablespaces to some extent using file groups on SQL Server.
I also have a customer that will be migrating their HPUX 11/Oracle 10 install to Windows/SQL after their implementation, so it is becoming a popular option.
Thanks,
Vince
joseurib
21st February 2007, 10:02
I have 4 servers with windows 2000 + sql server 2000 and very well except the limitation of the 32 bit architecture. Now I´m thinking to migrate my main server to a 64 bits architecture in order to improve the performance. I have posted a threat about it. Now It´s a pity to install a 32 bit environment. But the question is , has anyone installed a 64 bits arquitecture yet ?
Hitesh Shah
21st February 2007, 14:59
However if you have done some shell scripting around your current unix/baan installation be prepared that this will not be so easy any more on the windows platform.
Han
I have done some basic scripting in unix as well as VB scripting . VB scripting too looks comprehensive. Are there any known things VB scripting and batch files can not do.
Han Brinkman
22nd February 2007, 12:18
I have done some basic scripting in unix as well as VB scripting . VB scripting too looks comprehensive. Are there any known things VB scripting and batch files can not do.
You are probably correct, however unix scripts are sometimes nothing more that performing some commands which are not standard available on a windows server. Things like find, ps etc. were not standard available. You needed to install additional software. I always have to convince my sys admin that I need tools, on [li|u]nix its seems to be more common to have all these tools available. With each newer version of windows server we seem to get more tools available in a standard installation. (like taskkill)
E.g.: I had to automate a download of a file from the internet into our server. The software supplier gave me a tool which I can use to automate mouse clicks in IE but all I need is wget ....
Another example: ever tried to change a sequential table dump with the standard editor of windows ....
Is a VB interpreter/compiler standard installed on a Windows 2003 server?
Now it's going to look like another discussion about the pro and con's of windows. Lets' not do that. If you want to discuss it contact me via pm.
Regards,
Han
Hitesh Shah
22nd February 2007, 19:16
Thanks Han for quick reply . I too would not like to digress from the original topic and get into legthier meaningless discussions . It's of academic interest to me to know about the differences .
I too have not found an equivalent of powerful unix commands like cut , awk , ps , grep etc with various return value posibilities . However I found something like keyboard sequence generator (the way u found ) in VB scripting for which I do not know unix equivalent.
VB scripting interpreter is available in win2k & win2k3 all editions . All u need to do is create .vbs file in notepad with valid vb scripting command sequence . I still do not know how to debug / compile that . I am still a beginner. U can also use command line cscript.exe to run .vbs file.
I dont want to draw any conclusions as to superiority / inferiority of any scripting. If that were the case , I would vote for shell scripting , bcos I have experienced the tremendous power of the same.
Rather it's knowledge gaining exercise to find the strengths / weaknesses of the different scriptings (which of course is useful to me bcos I need to work in both envrions) . In that spirit , if u or anybody contributes to enrich everybody's knowledge, it is great (either in this thread or new thread) .
pamillet
3rd March 2007, 17:37
A current experience with ERP LN 6.1 FP3 on a fast 64bit Windows /MSSQL architecture make me a bit nervous...
If you have such live system with high volume (specially on manufacturing and warehousing), i'm very interesting !
We have very slow queries, even with only 1 user on the system. For example, backflush for one order take 3 to 5 minutes (20 to 30 lines per BOM, not so much !). I suppose the driver or some setup are not correct, but we work hard to identify the reason without succes after 2 weeks...
thanks a lot for any experience
Ronnyj
5th March 2007, 11:56
Ok. Your replies have been most helpful :)
Thanks!