Paul P
14th October 2005, 10:00
Hi guys,

Are there many of you out there who use SQL Server with your BaanERP? Is it any good over long run? We found a case where SQL Server was happily serving BaanERP for 3 years until the company data get to 35 Gigs and SQL Server starts giving out "consistency error".

We have since advised the client to put its old data on archive, thus reducing the database size to around 18 Gigs. After that, we haven't received any new "consistency error"

For you guys who are using SQL Server:
what is your database size?
how many years have you been running your BaanERP company data over SQL Server?
do you archive or put everything on the live database?
is SQL Server reliable through all the years?
Thanks, guys

Rgds,
Paul

Darren Phillips
14th October 2005, 11:36
I have a customer running BaanIVc4 SCH1 using sql7 enterprise the database is 18GB, they have been running since 1997 but I only ever keep 2 years live data the rest is archived. May not be a good example as they are only a small site 20 seats

p.cole
14th October 2005, 13:19
Paul P: Which version of SQL Server was your client running?

Paul P
15th October 2005, 06:57
Thanks for sharing, Darren. There probably aren't that many companies using SQL Server, huh? I'm starting up a poll on DBMS powering Baan, since no such poll has been started before. Please take part in the poll too. It'll be interesting to find out how many (or few) people use SQL Server :) . p.cole, my client is on SQL Server 7 too

Rgds,
Paul

dave_23
15th October 2005, 17:48
Hi Paul,

There are quite a few companies using SQL Server. From some statistics
I heard at SSA U MSSQL is 2nd behind Oracle in the baan world...

Dave

Darren Phillips
16th October 2005, 00:59
One thing I have noticed with SQL 7 it seems to operate better if the memory usage is allocated rather than dynamic seems to stay up longer, less reboots required once I turned of dynamic memory usage. I am planning to upgrade them to sql 2000 then I can use the Level 2 baan driver which will save space and hopefully speed it up a bit as it will pass the work of maintaining the indexes to the DBMS.

Paul P
20th October 2005, 09:22
Hi, Dave. Looking at the result of the poll on DBMS powering Baan, seems like you're right

Rgds,
Paul

Bob Freedman
20th October 2005, 18:54
We have been using SQL Server for almost 7 years on both Baan IV and Baan LN. We currently use SQL Server 2000, enterprise edition. Our databases are 59gb and 99gb respectively.

It works, is very low maintenance, we have had so few issues over the years that it's hardly worth talking about. I verify the dumps every morning, and it runs itself.

dave_23
20th October 2005, 19:08
ohhh, that would make me feel so lazy =)

Give me db2 any day, so complicated that your boss KNOWS you've
got to be smart!

Dave