zaidlaz
12th March 2002, 11:42
Hi,
We're on Baan IV on NT 4.0 Sp6a, Oracle 8.0.5.
On of our end-user usually encountered disconnection of it's baan client quite frequently. The user is running on win98 OS. Her baan client is B40c.045. Only about 2 users have this problem.
A check on her bw.log indicated the following:-
102-03-12[14:40:51]dcc9643: ******* S T A R T of Log message *******
102-03-12[14:40:51]dcc9643: Log message called from ipc_fdio.c: #92 keyword: IPC
102-03-12[14:40:51]dcc9643: user_type S language 2 user_name dcc9643 tty s
102-03-12[14:40:51]dcc9643: Errno 0 bdb_errno 0
102-03-12[14:40:51]dcc9643: Windows error 317 (The system cannot find message for message number 0x%1
102-03-12[14:40:51]dcc9643: in message file for %2.)
102-03-12[14:40:51]dcc9643: Windows Sockets error 317
102-03-12[14:40:51]dcc9643: Log_mesg: 2 : Connection to server lost: fd_read 14: num_bytes -1 errno 0
102-03-12[14:40:51]dcc9643: ********** E N D of Log message **********
Has anyone encountered a similar situation?
The question is will the updating of porting set will not solve this problem? I doubt it..
Best Regards,
Zaid
We're on Baan IV on NT 4.0 Sp6a, Oracle 8.0.5.
On of our end-user usually encountered disconnection of it's baan client quite frequently. The user is running on win98 OS. Her baan client is B40c.045. Only about 2 users have this problem.
A check on her bw.log indicated the following:-
102-03-12[14:40:51]dcc9643: ******* S T A R T of Log message *******
102-03-12[14:40:51]dcc9643: Log message called from ipc_fdio.c: #92 keyword: IPC
102-03-12[14:40:51]dcc9643: user_type S language 2 user_name dcc9643 tty s
102-03-12[14:40:51]dcc9643: Errno 0 bdb_errno 0
102-03-12[14:40:51]dcc9643: Windows error 317 (The system cannot find message for message number 0x%1
102-03-12[14:40:51]dcc9643: in message file for %2.)
102-03-12[14:40:51]dcc9643: Windows Sockets error 317
102-03-12[14:40:51]dcc9643: Log_mesg: 2 : Connection to server lost: fd_read 14: num_bytes -1 errno 0
102-03-12[14:40:51]dcc9643: ********** E N D of Log message **********
Has anyone encountered a similar situation?
The question is will the updating of porting set will not solve this problem? I doubt it..
Best Regards,
Zaid