ssbaan
26th July 2002, 21:45
Problem: We have some receivers that we know we will never get a matching invoice for. They are for partials, really old information, the information was combined, or some other unique information. These receivers display when we are matching and
it causes delays in finding the right receiver.
We tried to run an exchange scheme to code these receivers as
delivery status of 'all approved' (tdpur045.stsd). But this did not work as the records still appear and the code was even changed
back to free status. We then coded the deleivery status as 'all approved' and also coded the matched field as 'complete' (tdsls045.matc). This still did not work, but at least the delivery
status code did not get changed back to free. About the only way we found for these records to not display, was to change the
invoice quantity to equal the approved quantity. We do not really
want to do this.
Has anybody else run accros this? and what did you do to get around this? I guess we could customize the session to not display receivers coded as above, but we was hoping to see if
there was another 'BaaN' way to take care of this.
Thanks to anyone who may respond
it causes delays in finding the right receiver.
We tried to run an exchange scheme to code these receivers as
delivery status of 'all approved' (tdpur045.stsd). But this did not work as the records still appear and the code was even changed
back to free status. We then coded the deleivery status as 'all approved' and also coded the matched field as 'complete' (tdsls045.matc). This still did not work, but at least the delivery
status code did not get changed back to free. About the only way we found for these records to not display, was to change the
invoice quantity to equal the approved quantity. We do not really
want to do this.
Has anybody else run accros this? and what did you do to get around this? I guess we could customize the session to not display receivers coded as above, but we was hoping to see if
there was another 'BaaN' way to take care of this.
Thanks to anyone who may respond