Hi. I am running Rebuild opening balance/history from transaction (tfgld3203m000).

Our after audit adjustment is put to period 13.
So when I run it ,
for fiscal period : 1 - 13
for report period : 1 -13 ( is this correct??? I zoom in,it only show until 12,but I keyin 13 ,and press continue,it still alowed me to run. )


So ,does this will raise any problem??
If yes ? what should I do ?


what actually report period use for???


Thanks alot

Hi,
Reporting periods are used to collect data from finance with a different time frame than the one for fiscal periods..therefore there's no problem that you fill in 13 for a 12 reporting period definition, cause the system will not rebuild any unexisting period.
Hope this helps u.
Regards,
Pedro

While ur query is answered by pfsilva , looking at the value of reporting and fiscal periods 1 thing came to my mind is that u r not really using the reporting period functionality. Reporting period functionality is useful only if it's different from number of ficscal period. So u can remove this reporting periods by running session tfgld0290m000 when nobody is using finance session.

This will give some enhanced performance for finance sessions like finalization , rebuild and session updating online history. Before running this session , please discuss this with ur finance guys.