veyant
30th June 2003, 15:25
Hi,

i am facing a strange problem. I have made a JVR and processed it. Now it is showing as Non-finalised in tfgld102. However, if i see tfgld106 then it shows this JVR as finalised there. However, This transaction was fianlised.

I checked the tfgld102 table for this JVR and found that "update at end of session code" field is coming as empty.

as this is showing as finalised and non-finalised both, should i remove entries from tfgld102.

or i have to remove it from somewhere else also.

Please Advice.

veyant

MariaC
30th June 2003, 15:30
What type of transaction is the JVR? If it is a recurring journal then the batch should stay in tfgld102 as well so that when you execute the transaction next month the system know what value to pass the journal for.

veyant
30th June 2003, 15:36
It is recurring transaction. The batch under which it was generated was finalised. so i beleive the transaction should move from tfgld102 to tfgld106 and tfgld102 should not have that transaction if the batch is finalised. as it is showing entry in both tfgld102 & tfgld106 it is confusing.


Veyant

pfsilva
30th June 2003, 19:39
Hi,
The initial Recurring transaction stays forever in tfgld102 to serve as "model" for the ones to come.
Don't worry.
Regards,
Pedro

veyant
1st July 2003, 06:17
Thanks pedro & maria both.

veyant